<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Bio/Pharma Should Open Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.benchside.com/2010/01/why-biopharma-should-open-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.benchside.com/2010/01/why-biopharma-should-open-up/</link>
	<description>The Crossroads of Science and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data, not in papers at Bench Press</title>
		<link>http://blog.benchside.com/2010/01/why-biopharma-should-open-up/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Data, not in papers at Bench Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.benchside.com/?p=1198#comment-290</guid>
		<description>[...] I think they both have a very good point. Some form of centralized data repository, even if non-peer reviewed, could help tackle the problem that everyone hears about but nobody ever tries to solve of not having a central place to share negative results and protocols (akin to what this blog proposed previously for bio/pharma companies). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think they both have a very good point. Some form of centralized data repository, even if non-peer reviewed, could help tackle the problem that everyone hears about but nobody ever tries to solve of not having a central place to share negative results and protocols (akin to what this blog proposed previously for bio/pharma companies). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russia dreams of Silicon Valley sheep</title>
		<link>http://blog.benchside.com/2010/01/why-biopharma-should-open-up/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Russia dreams of Silicon Valley sheep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.benchside.com/?p=1198#comment-249</guid>
		<description>[...] Five-Year Plans) than it is for an authoritarian regime to encourage the trial &amp; error, open exchange of ideas, and “disorganized” development which is necessary to drive innovative technology disruptions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Five-Year Plans) than it is for an authoritarian regime to encourage the trial &amp; error, open exchange of ideas, and “disorganized” development which is necessary to drive innovative technology disruptions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSK Opens Up on Malaria at Bench Press</title>
		<link>http://blog.benchside.com/2010/01/why-biopharma-should-open-up/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>GSK Opens Up on Malaria at Bench Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.benchside.com/?p=1198#comment-245</guid>
		<description>[...] few weeks ago, we posted a number of reasons why we believe the Pharmaceutical industry needs to pursue greater openness to accelerate innovation and reduce the cost and time of drug development. A few weeks after that, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few weeks ago, we posted a number of reasons why we believe the Pharmaceutical industry needs to pursue greater openness to accelerate innovation and reduce the cost and time of drug development. A few weeks after that, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

