<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bench Press &#187; productivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.benchside.com/tag/productivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.benchside.com</link>
	<description>The Crossroads of Science and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Moving Online</title>
		<link>http://blog.benchside.com/2008/09/moving-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.benchside.com/2008/09/moving-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.benchside.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neil Saunders recently wrote about the the difficulty some people find in keeping an electronic notebook; over the past year, during my rotations, I&#8217;ve used both paper and electronic notebooks, and I&#8217;ve come to one conclusion: whatever you can make electronic, make it so. Trust me, it&#8217;s worth the effort. First, a bit of context. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Saunders recently wrote about the <a href="http://nsaunders.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/data-capture-versus-data-archiving/">the difficulty some people find in keeping an electronic notebook</a>; over the past year, during my rotations, I&#8217;ve used both paper and electronic notebooks, and I&#8217;ve come to one conclusion: whatever you can make electronic, make it so. Trust me, it&#8217;s worth the effort.</p>
<p>First, a bit of context. I&#8217;m an experimental biologist, not a computational biologist (at least, not primarily computational), so I have to deal with the fact that not everything in my research can be &#8220;electronified.&#8221; I&#8217;ve got samples in the freezer, vials of things in the fridge, cultures going in the incubators, and so on. Thus, I&#8217;m not looking for a notebook where I can keep every single bit of my research; maybe when <strike>the Matrix</strike> Google finally digitizes all of reality, I can finally just plug into my computer and never leave my desk.</p>
<p>On the other hand, though I&#8217;m not a computational biologist, I am pretty comfortable with computers. I program, I know HTML, and I can use Photoshop pretty quickly. I&#8217;m fine with cobbling together my own electronic lab notebook of sorts from the tools I can find on the internet (such as making a wiki); others (such as some in my lab) might find even formatting a wiki post to be an intimidating prospect. So what I do might not work for you.</p>
<p>Right now, my lab has an internal wiki using the <a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki">MediaWiki engine</a>, and I&#8217;ve been using my wiki space as my lab notebook. The wiki is backed up regularly, is password-protected, lets me view and edit the wiki from any internet-connected computer, has full-text search built-in, and has an editing format lets me put in cross-references to other entries; this is all I generally need for a lab notebook.</p>
<p>How do I manage the offline stuff, like gel pictures, data sheets, and so on? Well, I can put a surprising number of things on the wiki (for example, the lab next door lets me use their UV transilluminator, which has a CCD camera that I use to save TIFF images of my gels onto my network account), but basically I keep everything in a giant binder, numbered in order by date, and then put a reference to it in the online notebook. That way, I can easily find a result; just search the wiki for the entry I&#8217;m looking for, look up the reference number, and then find it in my binder of results. I do something similar with my experimental samples; my initials, followed by an experiment number, and then a vial number (such as &#8220;EJS-109-10&#8243;).</p>
<p>Unlike <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/drugmonkey/2008/04/science_20_open_access_lab_not.php#comment-851097">some people</a>, my note-taking philosophy is that the lab notebook shouldn&#8217;t necessarily be a dirty log of absolutely <b>everything</b> that I do or think about while I&#8217;m in the lab; I don&#8217;t put in routine calculations or procedures, such as cell culture maintenance, making common reagents, and so on. The whole point of a lab notebook is so that I can keep track of what I did, so if I, or someone else, needs to look up what I did, or what&#8217;s in a vial in the freezer, I don&#8217;t have to spend hours trying to remember what I meant with &#8220;RfMQ2-3a-4-5-07&#8243; on a tiny tube cap.</p>
<p>Sure, it&#8217;s sometimes nice to have everything in one lab notebook, gels pasted in and so on, but frankly, I find that even just the organizational benefits of being able to read my own handwriting and being able to search and cross-reference my posts to be worth giving up the all-in-one solution. When I kept a paper notebook, I spent so much time flipping back and forth between pages trying to remember where I&#8217;d written the concentration for the vial in my hand. Now, I just search for the vial number and <i>voila</i>!</p>
<p>Not only that, but I like to organize my lab notebook by project, rather than chronologically, because I generally have more than one thing going on at the same time. Organizing that way is doable on paper if you use a binder and loose-leaf paper, but still quite a hassle, especially since some experiments don&#8217;t always fit cleanly in one project or another, making it hard to find later (&#8220;Did I file it under this project or the other one?&#8221;). I prefer the electronic notebook, which lets me organize by both time and project, and lets me put experiments under more than one lab notebook by simply putting a link to it from both project pages. Not only that, but if I&#8217;m repeating an experiment with slightly different conditions, I can simply copy-and-paste a previous experiment and change just a few things.</p>
<p>Paper just doesn&#8217;t cut it for me anymore. If I were keeping a paper notebook, I&#8217;d basically be doing all the same things as I do on my electronic notebook: a loose-leaf notebook organized by projects, numbered experiments, separate binder of raw data, cross-referencing based on page numbers or experiment numbers, and so on. My online notebook does all this and adds remote access, readability, copy-and-paste, and searching to boot.</p>
<p>Not only that, but because my lab notebook is online, if I&#8217;m writing a paper or making slides for a presentation, I can be lazy and work from home. Win for the web!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.benchside.com/2008/09/moving-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

